Legal Opinion

Swift v. Island County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1976No. 44016PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This appeal involves a challenge to a determination made by the planning director of Island County that no impact statement under RCW 43.21C was required for the approval of three plats and building permits for a development known as the “Seabreeze” development in Keystone Harbor, Whidbey Island. The approval of two plats which subdivided the shoreline portion of that development is being attacked. The questions on appeal are: (1) What standard of review is appropriate when a court reviews an agency “threshold” determination under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and was that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Fleming v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Save a Valuable Environment v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, & Pacific Railroad v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Washington Medical Disciplinary Board v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1983

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API