Legal Opinion
Acme Foundry & Machine Co. v. Oil Well Improvements Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 19, 1924No. 6614PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARIS, District Judge.
The appellee herein, as plaintiff below, brought this action against appellant for an injunction, and an accounting for profits, and for treble damages, accruing from an alleged infringement of five claims of a patent for a “easing head” for oil wells, which was issued, on the 21st day of December, 1915, to one Alfred G. Heggem, as patentee and by him duly assigned to plaintiff.
The amended answer of defendant admitted that notice of the alleged infringement had been duly given to it, but denied the validity of the patent in controversy; averring that the same, in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge & Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Pneumatic Gas Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Stead Lens Co. v. Kryptok Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Sodemann Heat & Power Co. v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Anakin Lock Works v. Dillon Lock WorksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
3Cited by11 opinions
- Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Oil Well Improvements Co. v. Acme Foundry & MacHine Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Callison v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Buchanan v. Wyeth Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.