Legal Opinion

Borough of North Catasauqua v. Thomas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1928No. Appeal 157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

The borough appeals from the refusal of its motion for judgment n. o. v. The suit was a municipal claim filed April 24, 1924, under the Act of June 4, 1901, P. L. 364, and amendments, for the cost of re-setting a curb in front of property abutting on Arch Street. The property was not owned by defendant when the work was done, but was owed by him when the lien was filed. No brief was filed or argument made in this court for defendant.

The learned court below held that there was a dispute of fact for the jury “whether the defendant had received the notice that he was entitled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wall v. Royal Society of Good FellowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Theisen v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. City of New Castle v. Berger's HeirsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Pittsburgh-Texas Gas & Oil Co. v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spramelli v. Boro. of PunxsutawneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Jensen v. Bell Telephone Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API