Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh-Texas Gas & Oil Co. v. Adams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. Appeal, No. 158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

The parties plaintiff in this action as brought were L. J. Goodwin and Pittsburgh-Texas Gas & Oil Company, a corporation. At the trial the record was amended by eliminating L. J. Goodwin. The suit was in assumpsit. Susan J. Neth was the owner of a tract of land containing 57 acres more or less in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. On February 16, 1920, she entered into an agreement or lease with Montgomery and Murrie, giving them and their successors, heirs and assigns the exclusive *513right to drill for oil on this acreage. Adams became associated with the lessees as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Croyle v. Cambria Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Thompson v. SchochSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Theisen v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Diehl Manufacturing Co. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen Hall v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Borough of North Catasauqua v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Jensen v. Bell Telephone Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1937
  4. Ziernicki v. Gazdzik, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API