Commonwealth v. Williams

OPINION BY LALLY-GREEN, J.:

¶ 1 In Commonwealth v. Williams, 574 Pa. 487, 832 A.2d 962 (2003), our Supreme Court held that Megan’s Law II1 was, in most respects, constitutional. The Court also held that the registration requirements that were unconstitutionally punitive were severable. The Court remanded the case of Appellant Gomer Robert Williams, Jr., together with its companion case of Commonwealth v. Peters, 574 Pa. 487, 832 A.2d 962 (2003), for the trial court to review additional issues not decided by the Supreme Court. Id. at 986-987. On remand, without holding a hearing, the trial…