Legal Opinion

State v. Rademaker

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2012No. 26095PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Ryan Rademaker appeals his conviction of driving while under the influence of alcohol arguing that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution required the trial court to suppress evidence arising out of the stop of his car. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] At approximately 1 a.m. on a Sunday morning, Rademaker drove a friend to her home east of Milbank. A police officer and a highway patrol officer were conducting a sobriety checkpoint on the highway Rademaker was traveling. The officers had placed signs with flashing amber lights…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Eugene L. DawdyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Christopher CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. State v. ThillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. HerrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BowersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. BurkettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hamen v. Hamlin Cnty.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. TenoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. HettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API