Hubbard v. Matlock
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for a new trial. Appellee, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, recovered a judgment against the estate of James J. Walden, and the appellants Giles and Elsie Hubbard, hereinafter referred to as defendants. The facts, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the judgment, follow.
Plaintiff had lived with Walden for several years during which time Walden conveyed five parcels of real estate to her. After they separated, she conveyed one of the parcels back to Walden. At the time the deed was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Bus System, Inc. v. ToombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Goldstein v. FendelmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Shaw v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Tilghman v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Michie v. CalhounArizona Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Hubbard v. MatlockArizona Supreme Court · 1976