Legal Opinion

United States v. Cushman D. King

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 30, 1981No. 80-1246PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

At issue in this case is the scope of a criminal defendant’s constitutional right to adequate time for defense preparation. Our resolution of this issue necessitates reversal of the conviction.

I

Background

The circumstances relevant to this action are not disputed. Appellant Cushman King was indicted for income tax evasion on November 20, 1979, following a three-year investigation into his financial affairs conducted by the Government. At his arraignment on December 11, 1979, King’s trial was set for January 7,1980. Defense counsel immediately sought a postponement of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Cephus Donald Dyer v. Richard CrispCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Jack Walder Wright A/K/A Robert Morgan, John C. Heredia, and Joseph Wayne HawsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Jimmy Don WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Scott Brian JanoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Craig C. WirsingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. David Leroy Washington v. Charles E. Strickland, Superintendent, Florida State Prison, and Jim Smith, Attorney General of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API