Legal Opinion

Cephus Donald Dyer v. Richard Crisp

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1980No. 78-1772PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

DISPOSITION ON REHEARING EN BANC

I

INTRODUCTION

Appellant, Cephus Donald Dyer, appeals the denial of an application for writ of habeas corpus by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. Dyer claims violation of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel at his criminal trial in the Oklahoma state court. The appeal raises the issue as to the applicable standard which is to govern in order to determine whether there has been effective assistance of counsel in a given case and whether that standard has been violated in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Millard Robert Beasley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Kevin Winston Osborn v. Duane Shillinger, Warden of the Wyoming State Penitentiary A.G. McClintock the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Codianna v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. United States v. Charles Michael KissickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Jimmy Don WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API