Y-O Investments, Inc. v. Emken

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶ 1] In an amended judgment and order following a bench trial in which neither party requested special findings as provided by W.R.C.P. 52(a), the district court ruled that Y-0 Investments, Inc. (Y-O) did not breach the terms of a promissory note secured by a mortgage held by Rose Emken (Emken), but that Y-0 must take several actions during the life of the note and mortgage to protect Emken’s position and must pay her attorney fees in the sum of $2,000. Each party now appeals that part of the amended judgment and order adverse to that party. As explained below, we affirm the…