Legal Opinion

In re Welstead

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 3, 1972No. 8622PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claim 23 in appellant’s application serial No. 504,087, filed October 23, 1965, for “3-(Omega-Substituted Alkyl)-Indoles.” The rejection was on the ground that appellant had introduced new matter into the claim by way of amendment, in contravention of 35 USC132. We affirm.

The Subject Matter Claimed

Appellant’s application

* * * relates to certain heterocyclic organic compounds which may he referred to as 3-(omega-substituted alkyl) indoles, acid addition and quaternary am*1106mon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Thomas Lynn Fields v. Lloyd H. Conover and Robert B. WoodwardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. Application of James H. Saunders and Paul G. GemeinhardtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  4. John H. Biel v. Max ChessinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  5. In re ShokalCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re SmytheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. In re JohnsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. In re WeberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  5. In re EastCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API