Legal Opinion

David and Bonnie Cavanaugh, for the Minor Child, Kyle Cavanaugh v. Cardinal Local School District

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 15, 2005No. 03-4231PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants David and Bonnie Cavanaugh (“the Cavanaughs”), on behalf of themselves and their minor child, Kyle Cavanaugh, appeal the Magistrate Judge’s order denying their claim that the Cardinal Local School District (“Cardinal”) did not provide Kyle, who is disabled, with a “free appropriate public education” (“FAPE”) as required by the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. 1401 et seq. 1 Cardinal has filed a motion to dismiss the instant appeal for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the Cavanaughs, who appear…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Iannaccone v. LawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Meyer v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Eagle Associates v. Bank of MontrealCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Winkelman Ex Rel. Winkelman v. Parma City School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Mark Zanecki v. Health Alliance Plan of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. First American Title Co. v. DevaughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Barrett v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. D.K. Ex Rel. Kumetz-Coleman v. Huntington Beach Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API