Legal Opinion

Barton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1926No. 17377PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. Each ground of a motion for a new trial should be complete within itself, and by and of itself should point out error. A ground of the motion which alleges that “the court failed, to charge the contention of the defendant,” without naming any “contention,” is too indefinite to be considered.

2. Before a ground of a motion for a new trial based upon the refusal of the court to give written instructions to the jury can be considered, it must appear from the ground itself that the request “was tendered to the court before the jury retired to consider of their verdict.” Smith v. State, 27 Ga.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Isom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Hightower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Sanford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API