Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 30, 1921No. 12457PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Accusation of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Dublin — Judge Sturgis. April 18, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. Grounds 1 and 2 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, based upon the refusal of the judge to comply with written requests to charge, cannot be considered, since it does not appear that the requests were tendered to the court before the jury retired to consider of their verdict. Civil Code (1910), § 6084; Macon v. State, 24 Ga. App. 337 (100 S. E. 785).

2. Special ground 3 of the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, will be treated as having been abandoned.

3. There is evidence to support the verdict, and this court has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Macon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API