Legal Opinion
Isom v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 16, 1924No. 15320PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. “In this State the husband is recognized by law as the head of his family, and, where he and his wife reside together, the legal presumption is that the house and all the household effects, including any intoxicating liquors, belong to the husband as the head of he family. This presumption of course is rebuttable. Young v. State, *7622 Ga. App. 111 (95 S. E. 478), and authorities cited.” Hendrix v. State, 24 Ga. App. 56 (95 S. E. 478). Under the foregoing ruling there is no eiTor in the first special ground of the motion for a new trial.
Decided April 16, 1924. Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Hendrix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Richards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Barron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Ealey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.