Legal Opinion

McNeill v. . Thomas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The action is prosecuted against the defendant Thomas, administrator. He caused the land to be sold and holds it in trust under the deed executed by A. A. McDonald as trustee. Notwithstanding his answers to the two complaints the defendant filed a formal demurrer, and on the argument here demurred ore tenus, on the ground that neither the original nor the amended complaint states a cause of action. The answers do not waive the demurrer ore terms; a party may demur at any stage of the trial for failure to allege a cause of action. Cole v. Wagner, 197 N. C., 692; Key v. Chair Co., 199 N. C.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Cole v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Churchill v. . TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Key Ex Rel. Key v. Home Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Horne v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Thomas & Howard Co. of Shelby, Inc. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. In Re the Will of KempSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Matthews v. Shamrock Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API