Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Douglas

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1951No. Civ. 18247PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment that she take nothing against defendants entered after the general and special demurrers against her complaint had been sustained without leave to amend.

The allegations of the complaint in substance are: appellant is wife of defendant Edwin Samuel Douglas. Edwin S. Douglas, Jr., and Grace Lorraine Kunkle are his children by a former marriage. April 28, 1944, Edwin, Sr., sued appellant for divorce. She filed a cross-complaint and on a hearing of an order to show cause therein, the court ordered Edwin, Sr., to pay his wife $250 per month as alimony commencing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. McGibbon v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Knapp v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hatch v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Grable v. NunezSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. Filice v. BoccardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API