Interstate Commerce Commission v. Moore
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WHAM, District Judge.
This cause having come on for trial by the Court, Arthur F. Bronczyk, Attorney for Plaintiff, Interstate Commerce Commission, and J. Danforth Browne of Maefarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Attorneys for Defendants, the Court has considered the complaint of the Plaintiff, answer by Defendants, the evidence educed at the trial and the arguments of counsel, and has arrived at Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as follows:
Findings of Fact
I
This is a suit brought by the Interstate Commerce Commission under the provisions of Sections 204(a) (6) and 222(b) of Part II of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. DrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Georgia Truck System, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. La Tuff Transfer Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. IsnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. WernerDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1951