Legal Opinion

International Travellers' Ass'n v. Votaw.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 18, 1917No. 1816PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILESON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above). In a plea in due form and filed in due order of pleading appellant asserted a privilege it claimed to be sued only in Dallas county where, aloné, it transacted business. The claim was based upon the fact that it was a “mutual assessment accident insurance corporation” withoiit capital stock and without lodges, and, upon provisions in its by-laws, in Votaw’s application for the certificate, and in the certificate itself, that any suit thereon should be filed in that county. In its first assignment appellant complains of the action of the court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. Webb & HillTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Commercial Travelers' Mut. Acc. Ass'n v. FultonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  3. Dailey v. Preferred Masonic Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. International Travelers' Ass'n v. BranumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. National Benefit Ass'n v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. International Travelers' Ass'n v. BranumTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. National Aid Life Ass'n v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. HearneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. International Travelers' Ass'n v. BettisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Business Men's Assur. Ass'n v. ReadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API