Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Preferred Masonic Mutual Accident Ass'n of America

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1894PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought upon a benefit and indemnity certificate of $5,000$ issued by the defendant upon the life of Arthur H. Dailey, a conductor on the Michigan Central Railroad, and a brother of the plaintiff, who was named as beneficiary therein. The maximum indemnity in case of injury was $25 per week. The cause was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for the amount of the policy and interest.

The record shows that the deceased made an application for the insurance in writing on January 16, 1891. It was filled out by Mr. McBride, a solicitor for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. City of Davenport v. Peoria Marine & Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Perkins v. Washington InsuranceCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
  4. Pudritzky v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Kilborn v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Robinson v. United States Benevolent SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Kleis v. Niagara Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Moore v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API