Lumpkin v. American Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The contentions presented revolve around two main issues: first, the nature and extent of the alleged shortages; second, the sufficiency of the assignment and subrogation by the bank to the plaintiff.
1. Special grounds 3 and 15 of the motion for new trial- are expressly abandoned. Special grounds 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, and 14 assign errors going to the first issue as to the extent and nature of the shortage. Ground 1 objects to testimony of the cashier con eerning the teller’s scratch sheet. Ground 2 objects to testimony of the cashier with reference to the account of the Southern Brighton Mills…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- State v. . BrannerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Lumpkin v. American Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Fletcher v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wade v. DrinkardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Roper v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Hilliard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Keating v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Pittard (In Re Pittard)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.