Legal Opinion

Lumpkin v. American Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1943No. 30106PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The contentions presented revolve around two main issues: first, the nature and extent of the alleged shortages; second, the sufficiency of the assignment and subrogation by the bank to the plaintiff.

1. Special grounds 3 and 15 of the motion for new trial- are expressly abandoned. Special grounds 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, and 14 assign errors going to the first issue as to the extent and nature of the shortage. Ground 1 objects to testimony of the cashier con eerning the teller’s scratch sheet. Ground 2 objects to testimony of the cashier with reference to the account of the Southern Brighton Mills…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. State v. . BrannerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Lumpkin v. American Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. Fletcher v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wade v. DrinkardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Roper v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Hilliard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Keating v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Pittard (In Re Pittard)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API