Legal Opinion

State v. . Branner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 22, 1908PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Action tried before Peebles, JJuly Term, 1908, of SWAIN.

1Opinion of the Court

'Wajlkek, J.

The defendants were indicted in two counts,* first, for wilfully interrupting and disturbing a meeting of people held for the purpose of public worship in “Bradley’s Chapel Church,” and, second, for being intoxicated and conducting themselves in a rude and disorderly manner at Bradley’s Chapel, it being a place where people are accustomed to assemble for the purpose of divine worship and while they were so assembled for such purpose. The bill sufficiently charges the commission of a criminal offense. The defendants entered a plea of guilty. The case then states that the Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mastronada v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1882
  2. State v. . SaverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. State v. . CurtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1846
  4. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. FerrantoOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State v. WynnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. BattleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API