Legal Opinion

Parkinson v. Sears

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 15, 1926No. 2739PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

Appellant brought this suit in the district court of Lubbock county against appellee. Judgment was entered by the trial court in favor of appellee, from which judgment appellant has appealed to this court. *

Plaintiff’s petition is a formal action of trespass to try title, with an additional allegation that an issue of boundary is involved in the suit “as he is informed.”

Defendant’s answer consists of a general demurrer, general denial, plea of not guilty, and an answer to the merits, setting tip recognition of line as a common boundary between sections 6 and 7 of block D2 as the true boundary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Floyd v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Bohny v. PettyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Koenigheim v. SherwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chittim v. AuldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Wegener v. ErdmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Wood v. Fulton Property Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Jones v. McClatcheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. PresleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API