Legal Opinion · Dissent

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Presley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1939No. 1874Published

1Dissent

It seems to me there are at least two obstacles to an affirmance of this judgment. One is that the pleadings did not present a cause of action to cancel the release of the cause of action for damages; the grounds for cancellation being presented only by way of avoidance of the release. The other is that, as a matter of law, the evidence properly appraised, in connection with the terms of the release, was insufficient to authorize cancellation of the release.

Both of these questions are rendered difficult by reason of decisions apparently supporting contrary answers.

The first question, it is…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Moore v. SnowballTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Stewart v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Distributors Investment Co. v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1937

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API