Legal Opinion

Koenigheim v. Sherwood

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1891No. 6654PublishedCited by 8 opinions

. Error from Tom Green. Tried below before Hon. J. C. Randolph.

1Opinion of the CourtCollard, Judge

The main question in this case is one of boundary and agreed boundary.

Plaintiff claims and sues for a strip of land 131} varas wide on the west side of survey No. 324, also 31} varas wide on the east side of subdivision No. 3, and all of subdivision No. 4, part of survey No. 324. The intervenor, Koenigheim, claims certain lots in block 5 in the town of San Angelo, and a survey adjoining and north of block 5, beginning at its northeast corner, 672^^0- varas north and south by 140^ varas south 69-2-west, all of which he alleges is a part of the east side of survey No. 323.

Defendants claimed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Love v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Floyd v. RiceTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Lagow v. GloverTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Manvel Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Great Plains Oil & Gas Co. v. Foundation Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Parkinson v. SearsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Lopez v. VelaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API