Legal Opinion
Banks v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 9, 2006No. Nos. 99-4451 L, 04-277 LPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
This is a takings action. Plaintiffs own property along the eastern shoreline of Lake Michigan south of St. Joseph Harbor.2 Banks v. United States, 314 F.3d 1304, 1306 (Fed.Cir.2003) (Banks II); Banks v. United States, 62 Fed.Cl. 778, 778 (2004) (Banks III). Plaintiffs allege that the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), by its construction and maintenance of certain jet*208ties in St. Joseph Harbor, has effected a physical taking of plaintiffs’ shoreline property. Banks III, 62 Fed.Cl. at 778-79. Plaintiffs specifically allege that the Corps’ activities “have…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Rivera Agredano v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.