Legal Opinion

United States v. Ernst & Whinney

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 23, 1984No. C 82-885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBROS, District Judge.

This is an action to enforce an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) John Doe summons issued to and served upon the accounting firm of Ernst & Whinney (E&W) and its chief executive officer Ray Groves.

E&W markets nationwide an investment tax credit study (ITC study), the purpose of which is to advise its clients on methods of obtaining the maximum benefit of the investment tax credit available under 26 U.S.C. §§ 38, 46-48. After examining numerous tax returns in the Southeast United States, it was discovered that many E&W clients who had utilized…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. KisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. United States of America and Dennis J. Hanzel, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Jay T. WillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Samuel C. Brody v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. HankinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Ernst & Whinney, a General PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. United States of America Philip E. Coates v. Ernst & Whinney Ray GrovesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API