Legal Opinion

United States of America Philip E. Coates v. Ernst & Whinney Ray Groves

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1984No. 84-3283PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

In the course of conducting audits of taxpayers subscribing to an investment tax credit (ITC) study marketed by Ernst & Whinney, (E & W), a national accounting firm, in the southeastern part of the United States, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) discovered what it considered to be a pattern of improper and questionable practices employed by E & W in that study. As a consequence, the United States instituted an action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia seeking to enjoin E & W from marketing that investment tax credit study. United…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States of America and Dennis J. Hanzel, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Jay T. WillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Ernst & Whinney, a General PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. United States of America, and Mark W. Lawler, Special Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. James E. Lask and Ruth L. LaskCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States of America, and Toni v. Allen, Revenue Officer of the Internal Revenue Service v. David L. SheldonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API