Legal Opinion

United States v. Hankins

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1978No. Nos. 76-3467, 77-1967PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Circuit Judge.

No member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court has requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Fed.R.App.P. 35; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12). Therefore, the various Petitions for Rehearing En Banc are denied.

The panel which originally heard and decided these appeals has nevertheless thoroughly re-examined the issues and finds that it must adhere to the previously rendered opinion, United States v. Hankins, 5 Cir. 1978, 565 F.2d 1344.

We consider it not out of order, however, to state additional reasons supporting the results…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  3. United States v. DabbsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Ralph T. Miller & Joan Miller, in Re Subpoena Duces Tecum of James M. RussCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re Special Investigation No. 281Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API