Legal Opinion

Chase v. Hinen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 11, 1970No. 56-40540-3Published

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

C. C. Chase and his wife Mildred, appellants, sought to recover $2,363.16 from Andrew Hinen, his wife, and his son, respondents. Respondents counterclaimed for $6,527.25 alleging appellants: (1) misrepresented the absence of the weed nightshade; and (2) injuriously interfered with the irrigation of respondents’ com crop. The jury found for respondents on both the orginal complaint and their counterclaim. The trial court granted appellants’ motion for new trial, subject to respondents’ acceptance of a $1,085 reduction from the jury award of $6,527.25. Respondents accepted the reduction but the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bland v. MentorWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Samuelson v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Salter v. HeiserWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Davis v. East Contra Costa Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Pletcher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API