Legal Opinion

Davenport v. NVIDIA Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 28, 2024No. 5:23-cv-01877Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CARLTON DAVENPORT, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01877-PCP 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION 10 NVIDIA CORPORATION, Defendant. 11 12 Defendant Nvidia Corporation asserts that plaintiffs in this putative consumer class action 13 agreed to arbitrate their claims. For the reasons that follow, the Court concludes that plaintiffs’ 14 claims are covered by an enforceable arbitration agreement. Nvidia’s motion to compel arbitration 15 is therefore granted. 16 I. Background 17 According to the complaint…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Carey Brennan v. Opus BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API