Mateen v. Dicus

MlKELL, Judge.

In Mateen v. Dicus, 1 the Supreme Court reversed Division 1 of our opinion in this case, 2 holding that we erred in concluding that we lacked jurisdiction to consider two enumerations of error because appellants Suraiya A. Mateen, Roohi Fatima Faiyaz, and Reema Mohammedi failed to include the relevant orders in their notice of appeal. Accordingly, our prior judgment as to Division 1 is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. The Supreme Court remanded the case with direction that we consider appellants’ remaining enumerations on the…