Legal Opinion

Mateen v. Dicus

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 30, 2006No. S06G0358PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melton, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to determine the propriety of the Court of Appeals’ refusal to consider two enumerated errors on the ground that the order or ruling being questioned on appeal was not specifically listed in the notice of appeal. See Mateen v. Dicus, 275 Ga. App. 742 (621 SE2d 487) (2005).

The relevant facts reveal that Frank Dicus sued Mohammed Faiyaz, his wife Suraiya Mateen, and their daughters, alleging that Faiyaz had fraudulently transferred property to his family members to avoidpaying a judgment of nearly $450,000. The trial court entered a default…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southeast Ceramics, Inc. v. KlemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Hazelwood v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Bowers v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Mateen v. DicusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Duke v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Duke v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Patterson v. Bristol Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Rice v. Brakel, M.D., Center for NeurosciencesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Mateen v. DicusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API