Legal Opinion

Hedquist v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 13, 2000No. S99G0754PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Chief Justice.

In October 1994, appellants John H. Hedquist, Jr., Marianne Hedquist, and John H. Hedquist III, the latter both individually and as the trustee for a profit sharing plan and trust, filed suit against appellee Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith (“Merrill Lynch”), a Merrill Lynch employee, and several other individuals, seeking damages allegedly resulting from actions purportedly taken by the defendants in December 1990. In December 1996, the Hedquists dismissed with prejudice their complaint against the Merrill Lynch employee. The dismissal with prejudice stated…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. ArthurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Fowler v. VineyardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Marchman & Sons, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Georgia Department of Human Resources v. PossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Gilmer v. PorterfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Shelley v. Town of TyroneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Georgia Department of Corrections v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Hedquist v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Brock v. Sumter County School BoardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Women First OB/GYN Associates, L.L.C. v. HarrisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API