Legal Opinion

Bridgett Watson Adams, et al. v. 3M Company

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided April 20, 2026No. 4:24-cv-00832Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION BRIDGETT WATSON ADAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 4:24-cv-832-CLM 3M COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are around 600 customers of the Water Works and Sewer Board for the City of Gadsden who contend that Defendant 3M Company contaminated their drinking water by supplying PFAS to carpet manufacturers in Dalton, Georgia. (Doc. 1-1).1 3M moves for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that Plaintiffs’ property-damage claims are untimely and their personal injury claims aren’t viable. (Doc. 35). For the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Davide M. Carbone v. Cable News Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Payton v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API