Bridgett Watson Adams, et al. v. 3M Company
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION BRIDGETT WATSON ADAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 4:24-cv-832-CLM 3M COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are around 600 customers of the Water Works and Sewer Board for the City of Gadsden who contend that Defendant 3M Company contaminated their drinking water by supplying PFAS to carpet manufacturers in Dalton, Georgia. (Doc. 1-1).1 3M moves for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that Plaintiffs’ property-damage claims are untimely and their personal injury claims aren’t viable. (Doc. 35). For the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Davide M. Carbone v. Cable News Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Payton v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.