Bayshore Resources Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
This case comes before the court on motions for summary judgment filed by the parties. The parties claim there are no genuine issues of material facts in dispute, and each seeks summary judgment as a matter of law.
*628In their complaint, seven plaintiffs allege that the United States, acting through the Secretary of the Interior, wrongfully and in bad faith challenged certain unpatented mining claims held by them, and numerous other individuals and entities, which resulted in administrative and judicial declarations that such mining claims were invalid.1 Plaintiffs allege that…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Golder v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Griffin & Griffin Exploration, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Lins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Meincke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.