Meincke v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This action is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff seeks monetary relief under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 and 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), for an automobile and trailer which were forfeited to the United States in a proceeding against plaintiff’s husband, Paul Felix Jechura, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 848(a)(2). Defendant asserts that this court lacks jurisdiction to review criminal forfeitures ordered by another federal court. For the reasons discussed hereinafter, the court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss.
FACTS
This matter arises from a court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- United States v. Robert J. L'hoste, R. J. L'Hoste & Company, Inc., Clarence Eugene Rogers and Marvin Cochran, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bowman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Lark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Bernaugh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Uecker & Associates, Inc. v. L.G. Hunt & Associates, Inc. (In Re American Basketball League, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.