M. Adler's Son, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
The protests, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to certain articles, described on the invoices either as “Celluloid Baby 2}i" with Chenille stem” (manufacturer’s item number T-8294) or “Celluloid Baby with Milk Bottle & Diaper on stem, movable hands” (manufacturer’s item number T-8382), that were classified under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which, so far as pertinent, reads as follows:
Par. 1513. Dolls * * * composed wholly or in chief value of any product provided for in paragraph 31, having any movable member or part,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- W. C. Sullivan & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Dan-Dee Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984