Legal Opinion

M. Adler's Son, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 12, 1957No. 60634; protests 251737-K, etc. (New York)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The protests, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to certain articles, described on the invoices either as “Celluloid Baby 2}i" with Chenille stem” (manufacturer’s item number T-8294) or “Celluloid Baby with Milk Bottle & Diaper on stem, movable hands” (manufacturer’s item number T-8382), that were classified under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which, so far as pertinent, reads as follows:

Par. 1513. Dolls * * * composed wholly or in chief value of any product provided for in paragraph 31, having any movable member or part,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. W. C. Sullivan & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Dan-Dee Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API