Cortese v. Richfield
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
Appellant Robert Córtese appeals an order of dismissal and summary judgment. Córtese originally sued approximately 34 defendants in an asbestos products liability case. The trial court granted summary judgment to several defendants on the basis that the three-year statute of limitations had expired. The record on appeal, however, does not reflect the disposition of this action against three defendants. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure.
This is the second time that this matter has been before us on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cortese v. Atlantic RichfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Maroney v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. EubanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hankook Tire Co. Ltd. v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Richardson v. RodgersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Van DeVeer v. George's Flowers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Budget Tire & Supply Co. v. First National Bank of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
- Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. BeebeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008