Legal Opinion
United States v. Utex International
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 22, 1987No. Court 86-6-00702PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
In this action commenced pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1582(2), the United States seeks to recover liquidated damages based on the breach of defendants’ entry bond conditions. Utex, importer and principal on the bond, has defaulted by failing to appear or answer. 1 Therefore, Sentry, the surety on the bond, is the only defendant in this action. The matter is now before the Court on plaintiff’s motion, and defendant’s cross-motion, for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
Prior to importation, Utex as principal, and Sentry as surety, executed and delivered to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. A. N. Deringer, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- United States v. GoodmanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Vivitar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- United States v. AtkinsonUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Harry Sugarman v. Jack B. ForbragdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Utex International Inc., and Sentry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Continental Seafoods, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1987
- United States v. Monza AutomobiliUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- United States v. American Motorists InsuranceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- United States v. Lun May Co., Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.