Legal Opinion

Harry Sugarman v. Jack B. Forbragd

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1969No. 22102_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant seeks by suit for injunction to review an order of the Food and Drug Administration excluding from import as adulterated certain damaged coffee beans.

In entering its order the Food and Drug Administration was acting for the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare pursuant to the terms of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 381(a). 1 The question presented is whether (absent arbitrary or capricious action which clearly is lacking here) such an order excluding material from import under § 381(a) is subject to judicial review. The District Court held…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sugarman v. ForbragdDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1967

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ness Investment Corporation, and Canyon Lake Resort, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and Fred Wirth, ForestsupervisorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Sealed Air Corp. v. U.S. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  4. Dubrow v. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972
  5. Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API