Legal Opinion

Briggs v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 18, 1984No. 84 C 1155PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PRENTICE H. MARSHALL, District Judge.

Petitioner Frank M. Briggs has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging that the United States Parole Commission impermissibly refused to advance his date of release from incarceration. Respondents have moved to dismiss; in part, the motion is essentially one for summary judgment, as both parties have submitted materials outside the pleadings. 1

Petitioner was convicted of conspiracy to commit arson, interstate transportation in aid of racketeering, and use of an instrumentality of interstate commerce to facilitate commission of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Jackson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Benigno Marrero v. Warden, Lewisburg PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. Lupo v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
  5. United States v. Frank Briggs and Daniel SchlacksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. FriedlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  2. Masselli v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. Istvan Kele v. Peter Carlson, Warden, U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Ted J. Otsuki v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Zaccour v. BaerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API