Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank Briggs and Daniel Schlacks
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 25, 1983No. 81-2325, 81-2593PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The defendants-appellants, Frank Briggs and Daniel Schlacks, appeal from their judgments of conviction of violating the Travel Act and conspiring to violate the Travel Act. The defendants contend that because they intended to commit only one state crime (arson), the indictment charging them with multiple violations of the Travel Act 1 was multiplicious, and also that the district judge erred in sentencing the defendants to consecutive terms of imprisonment. The defendant Briggs contends that the trial court likewise erred when it admitted into evidence the identification…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Thomas E. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Robert Kubat, Cross-Appellee v. James Thieret, Warden, and Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General of Illinois, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Cochran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Shirley Hoffman v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Thomas J. KoliboskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- SUSAN WAKEEN DOLL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASHTON-DRAKE GALLERIES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.