Legal Opinion

Quaranta v. Cooley

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 30, 2011No. AC 31355PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

The defendant Joanne Cooley 1 appeals from an order of the trial court imposing sanctions in favor of the plaintiffs, Philip Quaranta and Arlene Quaranta, after finding the defendant in contempt. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) abused its discretion by imposing punitive sanctions for a civil contempt and (2) violated her right to due process by failing to afford her a hearing prior to imposing certain sanctions. 2 We agree with the defendant and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Shelton Education Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. DeMartino v. Monroe Little League, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Mays v. MaysSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Lord v. MansfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Stein v. HortonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fiorillo v. HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  2. Grasso v. GrassoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API