Weaver v. Adams
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
APPEAL BY PLAINTIFFS FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY. No. 212 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 7 June Term 1888, C. P On April 20,1888, Jacob D. Weaver and Milton D. Weaver brought assumpsit against Samuel Adams. The defendant pleaded non-assumpsit. At the trial on September 9, 1889, a case was shown sufficiently appearing in the first opinion of the court below, infra.
Read the full summary
APPEAL BY PLAINTIFFS FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY. No. 212 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 7 June Term 1888, C. P On April 20,1888, Jacob D. Weaver and Milton D. Weaver brought assumpsit against Samuel Adams. The defendant pleaded non-assumpsit. At the trial on September 9, 1889, a case was shown sufficiently appearing in the first opinion of the court below, infra. See, also, Adams v. Kuehn, 119 Pa. 76. At the close of the testimony, the court, Albright, P. J., on motion of defendant, entered judgment of nonsuit, with leave, etc. On October 29, 1889, the rule…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
The learned judge below has given ample reasons for directing this nonsuit. We need not add to what he has so well said.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Klecha v. BearDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Fees v. ShadelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902