Legal Opinion
Klecha v. Bear
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 23, 1989No. Civ. 88-0318PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEALON, District Judge.
Currently before the court in the above-captioned diversity action is defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds of res judicata. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion will be granted and this action will be dismissed.
BACKGROUND
On August 29,1987, plaintiffs, citizens of New Jersey, entered into an agreement of sale with defendants, citizens of Pennsylvania, related to the operation and business of the Trimline Fitness Center Health Club. The total purchase price of the transaction was six hundred and seventy thousand dollars…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Betz Laboratories, Inc. v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Stradley v. Bath Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Schwan v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re PCH AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Zhang v. Southeastern Financial Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997