Fees v. Shadel
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 265, Oct. T., 1900, by E. F. Phillips, from order of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Jan. T., 1897, Nos. 128 and 129, discharging rule to strike off judgments in case of B. W. Fees v. Joel Shadel, Agent. Rules to strike off judgments and vacate proceedings. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
This is an appeal byE. F. Phillips from an order of the court of common pleas discharging a rule taken to show cause *195why certain judgments should not be stricken off, and why all subsequent proceedings thereon should not be vacated.
E. F. Phillips became the purchaser, at a sheriff’s sale, of a general store, which had been owned and conducted by Matilda Shadel, and placed her son, Joel Shadel, in charge, as his agent, to continue the business until all the debts for which he had become responsible were paid in full, after which time Joel Shadel was to be the owner of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thrall v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Levan v. MillhollandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Wilkinson's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Smyth v. LevySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Weaver v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.