ROHNER ET UX v. Neville
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
COODWIN, J.
In a petition for rehearing, the defendant contends that we erred in upholding the plaintiffs’ claim of *43adverse possession because the disputed lands were registered under the Torrens system, and accordingly were not subject to adverse possession.
The transcript and exhibits reveal that the disputed lands were originally patented in 1864. The first conveyance was recorded in the Linn County deed records in 1872. Thereafter in 1908 a predecessor in title of the defendant registered certain lands under the then new Torrens system of registration, now described…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Van Natta v. Nys & EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Warren Et Ux v. Parsons Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Kuchta v. Western Oldsmobile, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Broyles v. Northwest Portrait FinishersOregon Supreme Court · 1961