Legal Opinion

Warren Et Ux v. Parsons Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1960PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover general and punitive damages for an alleged wrongful eviction. The jury returned a plaintiffs’ verdict for both general and punitive damages and the defendants appeal.

The defendants make only two assignments of error. (1) That the trial court erred in failing to sustain defendants’ motion for an involuntary nonsuit after plaintiffs had rested, and (2) the trial court erred in denying defendants’ motion for a directed verdict after all of the evidence had been submitted.

It is, of course, a well-established rule of law, requiring no citation of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richter v. DerbyOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Peck v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Agan v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sheets v. B & B Personnel Systems of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. ROHNER ET UX v. NevilleOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. ROHNER ET UX v. NevilleOregon Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API