Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Pearl Assurance Company Limited

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1944No. 30460PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

1. A requirement in a policy of fire insurance, that the insured shall submit to an examination under oath touching the matters relating to the risk assumed by the company and the destruction of the property insured, and that he shall subscribe to the same, is binding and valid; and a refusal to comply with this condition will preclude the insured from recovering upon the policy, where it provides that no suit can be maintained until after a compliance with such conditions. Firemen’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Sims, 115 Ga. 939 (42 S. E. 269).

2. Where the plaintiff assigns as a reason for his not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Firemen's Fund Insurance v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. ParnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pearl Assurance Co. Ltd. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Diamonds & Denims, Inc. v. First of Georgia InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Saft America, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Brookins v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982
  5. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API